Skip to main content

Goliaths on the fall

Russia's silent nod to withdrawal from Ukraine, can only be the painful submission of a haughty wrestler after dozens of unsuccessful bids to win. The only face-saver in this context, is that it was given cover of the US-Iran deadly war, to quickly cut its wartime losses, and somehow make a case for pull back. The US however lacks this option. Iran has been a failure of its grandeur, especially after years of chiding its own allies on their lack of military spend. US has proven, that in spite of a large military with advanced technology, its never a 'easy win' in the 21st century. US war exploits since Vietnam, have drawn more and more and more unpopularity, but like a rusty army unwilling to relinquish its chainmail armors, the US army keep walking into the same track over and over again. Much detailed analysis has been made on how Iran had prepared itself for this war for decades now, and what US has proven to itself is that Middle east is no Venezuela. 

To look back at the last few US exploits; the Iraq war saw a comprehensive regime change (perhaps that was the first goal-post in the Iran expedition), the Taliban war was a temporary reversal of regime (could have been the desperate second goal-post). But the Iran war was a resilient blow back to the US plan. More so, it was a eye-opener for its Arab allies. UAE quickly realizing its has become a vassal of the US military arm, and saw its future in accepting itself as one (even when it meant giving up its sat at the OPEC). The states of Kuwait and Bahrain are yet to take such a decisive step, but the Iran conflict has pushed them much closer to the decision door. 
Russia's story however, is one of muddled success. It has seen a few attempts work out, in Chechnya, Crimea and Georgia. In fact, Russia was push its way over the last Ukrainian govt, when it resisted Moscow's might. Working in the west European backyard with a silhouette of the erstwhile USSR, gives Russia the might which US lacks in the Middle est. But Zelensky's defiance might have changed the game for once and all. Russia will re-think before it wages another of such deadly territorial grabs, licking its wounds of the Ukrainian operation over and over again. 

Finally, the other goliath in he making, China. While its economic run has given China the might to grab pieces on the geopolitical chessboard, it shudders before every move. The Hong Kong lesson has taught it to be steady, It knows that repeating a Tibet with Taiwan, will not be excused in the similar manner. China has found the world getting increasingly hostile in accommodating another bully in the street, and for the time being, it must satiate itself with the title of military super-power of the future. 

Popular posts from this blog

Behind the Gig economy.

The battle between push and pull is familiar to supply chains. For ages now, industries have produced goods they thought were relevant for the customer and then used networks of distributors and retailers to push these to the consumers. The apparent outcome of this is the massive scale of advertising that uses tactics to lure a customer base for the product.  The shift to a pull-based supply chain seems more rational. One is where the production takes in the customer's demand before the show. Not only does that minimize the risk of product failure, but it also captures the market sentiment with greater accuracy. In other words, it caters to an existing demand rather than creating one for itself. This process is lean and profitable, except for a shortcoming; Production takes time. During the early 90s, when the internet spread like wildfire, people almost immediately expected the internet business to take off. However, it was only after a decade and a massive dot com bubble that tod...

Gift of India

India finds its etymological origins in the Indus, the first of the largest rivers that marks the plains if one travels through the land routes from the West. However, in the present fate of the State, the river lies in Pakistan, best described as a geopolitical adversary. The other words for the state, like Hindustan or the abode of Hindus, have slightly relevant terminology but none that reflects the actual history. Since no Hindu king had presided over the land after the 11 century. Further, it's crucial to note that no king has ever ruled over the entirety of present India at any point in history. Instead, rulers have found it easier to consolidate the connected regions of Pak and Afghan than the southern coasts. Midst all these historical facets, the question that begs to be asked is when India began to identify itself. Many believe the form that India exists today must be credited to the Britishers. I find this argument, first of all, hollow and, secondly, misleading. Open be...

Religiously Yours: The Role of Preachers and the Search for Truth

Most people search for hope, for belonging, for purpose. Religion can offer all of that, but if it ever sidelines your freedom to choose, to think, to wonder—something precious is lost. So, what’s the answer? Not confrontation, but honest, unguarded questions. Questions that aren’t meant to provoke or undermine, but to genuinely understand and maybe even reshape how we see the world, each other, and ourselves. See, preachers—like everyone else—filter their teachings through layers of personal experience. Some are gentle guides, others take a hard line, but most fall somewhere in the middle. That’s not surprising. We all lean on what we know: our stories, our histories, our mistakes. It’s just that, for religious teachers, this bias carries extra weight. Sometimes their perspective anchors a community, offering stability and belonging. Other times, accumulated bias can make a religion feel rigid or exclusionary—raising walls instead of building bridges. There’s an intricate relationshi...