Skip to main content

What if "Maggus" don't have a choice ?

There are two possible reasons for stopping by this post; you happened to be among those hard-working study-serious college-goer who lament not being perceived as fun by his/her peers. Or you have a soft spot for these people, striving to pay off the debt from when he single-handedly completed your group project. There could be a hundred other reasons, so let's jump into the matter.

Let's construct a scenario with simplified assumptions. Suppose there are 5 students in your project team. Each of you has decided whether you want to work or not. If you decide to work, you must put in an effort of value "e". The project will be possible if at least 3 of the students participate. A successful project rewards everyone in the team "r", which is greater in value than "e". So what do you think will happen.
Let's assume that each of you is rational (which secretly implies you will maximise your personal gain whenever possible). Will all five contribute ?? Will no one work?? Is there another situation??
  • Will all of the five work?
Let's assume they do. But each of them realised that they put in more effort than required. And this information is available to all of them. In fact, two of them can slack and still get the reward "r". This is a better scenario for them since r > r - e. So the next time they work, all five may slack.
  • When no one works.
In this case, no or works, and there is no reward. In fact, there is no incentive for anyone to start working even since he/she can't single-handedly complete the project. So wasting that effort e needs to make sense.
  • Wait, what if just 3 of them worked?
And lo, here we have three (let's call them maggus) who decided to pull off the task. The whole group gets the reward. But will the non-working members start working? Well, no. They have a reward r and have no incentive to spend that effort e because that will reduce their gain to r - e. 
Can the maggus stop working? Well, no. they have a reward r - e.  If they stop working, the project will fail, reducing their net gains to 0. This is a Nash equilibrium. A point where no player can take an action that maximises his personal gain.

In fact, this is of serious consequence to public goods, notably called the free-riders problem. But what remains extremely important to conclude from this example, is there are some maggus who know they are stuck in a group that can't let them be otherwise. Just like I can't stop writing "in fact"s.

Popular posts from this blog

The persistence of war

Countess authors have written on war, whether war and peace or the art of war. It's sometimes astonishing how pervading the idea of a war is over human civilisation. But the nature and structure of war have mainly changed, while the similarities are uncanny. But without just being philosophical, let's understand how the terms that are floated today are a realisation of power and limitation of its projection. In that sense, this piece is a treatise on peace or, if I can, a seeming decline in war's enticement. Wars were fought for the expansion of one's territory. But it remains a question of how and who the war served. In that sense, the armies were a protector of the ruler. Thus, the war was intended to gain rule except when it was led by vengeance or the decree of a religion. But what was expected was that most of the greatest conquests were in the form of an expedition, thus having to have a geographical continuity, which became necessary for people to establish loyal
dive in...

The Gems on Coursera

I found myself in a rare situation this April. Had things stuck to their schedule, I would have completed my graduation curriculum and would have been ticking off any college goer's dream check-list, which did include a few travel and adventure. But, the situation as of 2020 has a different story to tell. With no end to this quarantine insight, the check-list became an impossibility.  So I took the Coursera COVID offer for colleges and started my odyssey to various areas of studies, my mechanical engineering syllabi had prevented me from. So without much ado, here are the "Gems" on the courses platform, each one must give a shot at.  Model Thinking This course gives an unusual approach to what we have accepted as complex socio-political phenomena. With simple logical and mathematical principle, Prof. Scott E. Page recreates results which have puzzled global leaders. He argues that this approach to reality is a must for all in this 21st century, and I could not agree mo
dive in...

Election afterthoughts

The unfolding of the Indian election might have come as a surprise to many, for one is the BJP who steamrolled the campaign seasons with slogans of "400 par". While it remains 240 seats popular in a house of 520 members, a few stories should not go unnoticed. First, the BJP's popularity and the win for a third term is no ordinary feat. Only a few leaders of the past have managed such an elusive feat. This, indeed, is the trust that the brand Modi has built over the years. In politics, we often get acclimatized to the situations, in certain aspects too critical of it. When the young generation looked at Indira Gandhi's cabinet, they vowed never to again let such a solid mandate to a single party that its chief could declare an emergency, and no structures would be able to prevent that. This, however, ended up in fragmented colours in the Lok Sabha, the era of coalitions and surprise prime ministers. Needless to say, the horse-trading of MPs and the mindless corruption
dive in...