Skip to main content

Hindu Rate of Growth

When finally made independent, the Indian state was poised to embark on a prosperous economic voyage. But disappointingly enough, this golden bird never took off on that miraculous journey. For decades till the 1990s, the growth was stuck below 4 per cent, churning more people into poverty than out of it. Countries like Japan, whose industrialization started almost as soon as India, had grown to become top economies when India languished to meet its balance of payments. Even after liberalising the economy, it was stuck with institutions and bureaucracy.

Let's look at two decisive steps that made a growth rate be named after a religious identity. In 1947, the economy planned for India was mixed, allowing corporate and public ventures. Business houses like Tata were materializing this promise of India. However, a solid socialist turn was stamped into the economic planning in 1955, the Avadi Congress sessions. Forcing state control over important industries and enforcing 5-year plans borrowed from the then USSR. The only outcome was that these large institutions grew ineffective and inefficient, and the other consumerist industries like automobiles, were trapped in license bureaucracy.

Many say the failure of this vision, along with the loss from China, left Nehru a broken man. An idealist defeated by pragmatism. The next decisive turn took place under the watch of his successor, Indira Gandhi, in 1970. She was upfront in dismissing the pretence of a mixed economy and transforming the whole economy to State control. NNationalizationof banks, insurance and even consumer goods production. Taxation policies that lead to a massive rise in corruption and black money. All putting India in the way to an economic debacle.

Although it's been over two decades of liberalisation, the biggest banks are still publicly owned and infamous for their apathy. In the 80s, it is believed that the IIT engineers fled the country since procuring a computer was banned under Indira Raj. At this juncture, it is essential to rrealizeif the current govt is heading towards such a debate with public appeasement. For what soothes the ear, may lure us to an uncanny fate.

Popular posts from this blog

Birth of a flood - a poet's admire of rain

The sky is almost dark, save for those last golden tinges that would fade in no time. As palm trees mark the oblivion, a muddy reflection forms the ground. The last few days were mostly rainy. So profound is our love for rain. And why wouldn't we? Unlike most other seasons, rain is so tender. A drop of patience which is about to reach its final destiny. Every time I look at raindrops, they remind me of a struggle. A journey that begins with summer in an aura of dry and burning heat. And in no time, the drop loses its sources. The long-held identity of its mother. With the loss of identity, an awakening awaits. The pleasure of reaching out and bonding. As our drop moves up and up the end of the sky, it realises the futility of pride and the necessity to bond. This comes with age. Not until it is near Earth does it agree to meet with other wanderers of the new world. And finally, all our drops reach the cold atmosphere. The coldness makes life dreary and lonely. As the youthfulne...
dive in...

Turning back from pull to push

Two recent campaigns deserve attention from marketing enthusiasts, one of Campa Cola (reenergised by the Reliance Group) and of Tata Sampann's species. The challenges these two brands face are too distinct from one another. Campa, on the one hand, aims to fight the global brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereas Sampann looks to create a market in indian spices that has been dominated by local players like MDH and Everest. However, their strategies have something in common: getting the distributors to stock more of their products on the shelves. Campa is offering the distributors twice the margins, while Sampann is leveraging its vast portfolio to make stocking only Tata products a win for the distributors. Image credit: Economic Times To understand why this is happening, and what makes this interesting, one has to look back on the history of marketing, more specifically the shift from a push to a pull-based marketing, where the focus of the brands shifted from pushing their produc...
dive in...

Politics of Perpetuity

There are obvious downsides to democracy. When we look at the distribution of opinion on a particular issue, it generally follows a normal distribution. This implies that to achieve the majority, it's theoretically advised to stick to the centre. And this love for mediocrity makes democracy allergic to politically solid decisions.  Along with it, democracies tend to be the rooster for sweet talkers. And that is an outcome rather than a voluntary trait. Primarily because most voters need to be equipped to deal with the complexities of the field. For example, it could be more practical for an electrical engineer to comprehend medical patterns and the pandemic's effect on production. Thus, democratic institutions need people managers who have two keywords to watch out for - sweet talking and status quo. However, democracies have been hugely popular. And people have reported being happier. Whether this is induced, indoctrinated or influenced is another question. But history has cho...
dive in...