Skip to main content

Consulting Constulting

Consultants are the most rampant, yet the most sushed topic in corporate. There are enough consulting firms today, to make one wonder if we need so many of them. And if the conundrum of needing to hire consultants was not big enough, here comes the issue of what they actually do. Over the last few years, many in the media have reported consulting firms to have held too much power for far too long to have become corrupted. Firms have relied on shady practices to keep their business afloat and, on many occasions, have walked out without much consequences. However, I find the above conclusion misrepresenting, if not incorrect. 

The need for consultants doesn't arise from corporate's need to implement change or resolve issues. Corporations today are locked in an environment of constant change, be it in business models, products or even markets. The law forbids two companies from coming together and promising on a "happy ever-after". The consequence of this is action and retribution aimed at gaining more of the market. In this dog-eat-dog world, companies need to change, and many of them do. But the trick is the nature of the change; one is incremental (for which the companies rely on the middle managers) and gradual, and the other is sudden and disruptive (for which most top managers have to step in).

In industries where the body of knowledge is not very well defined, firms benefit immensely from their competitors' knowledge (non-proprietary). These could include business models, third-party software or even recruitment processes. The industry stands to benefit if this information is shared and the efficiency in the processes is improved. While communicating directly is forbidden, consultants often come in helpful with their vast body of knowledge. 

However, the need is more pressing when a disruption is to be implemented. Here, it is crucial to appreciate that each firm wants its employees to marry into its company culture. But once they do so, they lose their uniqueness and tend to groupthink. While one way of resolving this is to hire fresh and lateral talent, the issue tends to come up a few times. The easy hack of this is, therefore, to hire consultants who don't carry the burden of the corporate culture and neither have to be assimilated into the culture. A symbiotic agent of disruption. 

The third and more nuanced reason could be that nothing markets your internal strength to your competitors more than a team of consultants running in your corporate office. In fact, the fancier the firm, the more the advertisement of strength. And why do firms need this fluff ? Many times in the economy, a firm can enjoy a superior status just by signalling its strength rather than actually fighting it out in the market because, more often than not, competitors buy the bluff.

Popular posts from this blog

Birth of a flood - a poet's admire of rain

The sky is almost dark, save for those last golden tinges that would fade in no time. As palm trees mark the oblivion, a muddy reflection forms the ground. The last few days were mostly rainy. So profound is our love for rain. And why wouldn't we? Unlike most other seasons, rain is so tender. A drop of patience which is about to reach its final destiny. Every time I look at raindrops, they remind me of a struggle. A journey that begins with summer in an aura of dry and burning heat. And in no time, the drop loses its sources. The long-held identity of its mother. With the loss of identity, an awakening awaits. The pleasure of reaching out and bonding. As our drop moves up and up the end of the sky, it realises the futility of pride and the necessity to bond. This comes with age. Not until it is near Earth does it agree to meet with other wanderers of the new world. And finally, all our drops reach the cold atmosphere. The coldness makes life dreary and lonely. As the youthfulne...

Turning back from pull to push

Two recent campaigns deserve attention from marketing enthusiasts, one of Campa Cola (reenergised by the Reliance Group) and of Tata Sampann's species. The challenges these two brands face are too distinct from one another. Campa, on the one hand, aims to fight the global brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereas Sampann looks to create a market in indian spices that has been dominated by local players like MDH and Everest. However, their strategies have something in common: getting the distributors to stock more of their products on the shelves. Campa is offering the distributors twice the margins, while Sampann is leveraging its vast portfolio to make stocking only Tata products a win for the distributors. Image credit: Economic Times To understand why this is happening, and what makes this interesting, one has to look back on the history of marketing, more specifically the shift from a push to a pull-based marketing, where the focus of the brands shifted from pushing their produc...

Politics of Perpetuity

There are obvious downsides to democracy. When we look at the distribution of opinion on a particular issue, it generally follows a normal distribution. This implies that to achieve the majority, it's theoretically advised to stick to the centre. And this love for mediocrity makes democracy allergic to politically solid decisions.  Along with it, democracies tend to be the rooster for sweet talkers. And that is an outcome rather than a voluntary trait. Primarily because most voters need to be equipped to deal with the complexities of the field. For example, it could be more practical for an electrical engineer to comprehend medical patterns and the pandemic's effect on production. Thus, democratic institutions need people managers who have two keywords to watch out for - sweet talking and status quo. However, democracies have been hugely popular. And people have reported being happier. Whether this is induced, indoctrinated or influenced is another question. But history has cho...