Skip to main content

Jai Jawan, Jai Kishan

While speaking about the ideal path for the saffron party, Dr S. Swamy casually mentioned the unspoken truth. The 2019 elections could be won just on the lines of communal conservatism, striking an image of glorified India and the role of Hindus in it. But, putting his political acumen into context, he added that 2024 candidates, however, will have to account for the promised economy, governance and development. And so did the cards unfold; the BJP manifesto, which fueled the long-standing demands of and unified Hindu Rastra, seemed to land the party in a landslide majority.

But, as incumbency keeps knocking on the door, leaders must find new successes to celebrate. And here we come to another famous slogan "Jai jawan, Jai Kisan". Military mavericks and agriculture agendas have the potential to persuade public opinion in favour of the party when put rightly. Therefore reforms must be more appealing than revolutionising. That brings into the picture primarily non-liberalised agriculture, which employs massive numbers. The fear of losing out to corporates and conglomerates regarding market grab. So let's look at the conditions that make the privatisation of agriculture such a scary picture in India.

In the heart of the fear lies the spiritual attachment to the land. The piousness with which land is treated in India makes it a pivotal gear in the cultural machine. It's a land that reveres its soil with rituals and festivals arising from an agrarian culture. To make way for privatisation is to allow competition with the top guns and a subsequent loss of traditional landholding. To sum up, I believe the Indian farmers are unwilling to leave behind their lands and adopt a more 'worker in a factory' attire.

The second reason, which has disgusted everyone alike, is the bureaucracy. Known for its apparent sluggishness and ineffectiveness, the new bill threatens to put farmers in lines they no longer want to be (after a scary demonetisation experience). Also, we have built a perception of the gruesome turmoil farmers have to undergo if they, unfortunately, are on the wrong side of the law. Although every government has promised to smoothen the process, it's all old wine in new bottles. And do remember, what we are asking for here, is a change in the mindset, which is second in the hardness scale to 'change of culture'.

Finally, we have had some of the worst years in the centuries, none less than those of the great wars. And there has to be a backlash of the casualty and depression on the incumbent leaders. This brings us back to scapegoat politics. With its opposition already made diminutive and military exploits overstretched,  the saffron party is losing scalps to sacrifice. It's a short time before people seek an assessment report, and challenging questions follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Behind the Gig economy.

The battle between push and pull is familiar to supply chains. For ages now, industries have produced goods they thought were relevant for the customer and then used networks of distributors and retailers to push these to the consumers. The apparent outcome of this is the massive scale of advertising that uses tactics to lure a customer base for the product.  The shift to a pull-based supply chain seems more rational. One is where the production takes in the customer's demand before the show. Not only does that minimize the risk of product failure, but it also captures the market sentiment with greater accuracy. In other words, it caters to an existing demand rather than creating one for itself. This process is lean and profitable, except for a shortcoming; Production takes time. During the early 90s, when the internet spread like wildfire, people almost immediately expected the internet business to take off. However, it was only after a decade and a massive dot com bubble that tod...
dive in...

Gift of India

India finds its etymological origins in the Indus, the first of the largest rivers that marks the plains if one travels through the land routes from the West. However, in the present fate of the State, the river lies in Pakistan, best described as a geopolitical adversary. The other words for the state, like Hindustan or the abode of Hindus, have slightly relevant terminology but none that reflects the actual history. Since no Hindu king had presided over the land after the 11 century. Further, it's crucial to note that no king has ever ruled over the entirety of present India at any point in history. Instead, rulers have found it easier to consolidate the connected regions of Pak and Afghan than the southern coasts. Midst all these historical facets, the question that begs to be asked is when India began to identify itself. Many believe the form that India exists today must be credited to the Britishers. I find this argument, first of all, hollow and, secondly, misleading. Open be...
dive in...

Religiously Yours: The Role of Preachers and the Search for Truth

Most people search for hope, for belonging, for purpose. Religion can offer all of that, but if it ever sidelines your freedom to choose, to think, to wonder—something precious is lost. So, what’s the answer? Not confrontation, but honest, unguarded questions. Questions that aren’t meant to provoke or undermine, but to genuinely understand and maybe even reshape how we see the world, each other, and ourselves. See, preachers—like everyone else—filter their teachings through layers of personal experience. Some are gentle guides, others take a hard line, but most fall somewhere in the middle. That’s not surprising. We all lean on what we know: our stories, our histories, our mistakes. It’s just that, for religious teachers, this bias carries extra weight. Sometimes their perspective anchors a community, offering stability and belonging. Other times, accumulated bias can make a religion feel rigid or exclusionary—raising walls instead of building bridges. There’s an intricate relationshi...
dive in...