Skip to main content

Offender's Compunction

 


“Death is a certainty for all of us, both you and me.” Does this offend you???
how about this “you b***** mo***, I CAN’T WAIT TO SEE YOU DEAD.” This does hurt.
So, Is right to offend an indispensable part of the freedom of expression and speech? I would gladly say NO.

Let’s start with the major stakeholders, the offender and the offended. It’s not natural for us to step out of our comfort zone and hurt someone else. Then why do we do so? The answer is psychological…
Its the repressed emotions of anger, jealousy and pride that seek expression inform of hate-speech, misinformation and condescending remarks. Thus every example of offence is a sign of spreading emotional malice in the society.

If you have ever been on the side of the offended,(given the rates of cyber-bullying, you are under threat), our body initiates a defence mechanism every time we are offended. That could be resistance or denial. Resistance is when we reciprocate offence with another offence and needless to say this is what begets violence. But the dangers of denial are no less. Every time we laugh off at a relatable meme or joke, we do realise the unhappiness and incompleteness. This way we keep destroying a part of our self-image. And this scenario is troublesome.

Also, we do live in a society, where minorities exist, and given the right to offend, the majority by the sheer power of their number marginalise them. And this has been the starting point of all homicides.

Coming to the subjectivity of offence, and our inability to draw a line between what is offending and what is not. We are at a crossroad with two options ahead. One to do away with drawing lines forever, unleashing a beast in the social structures. The other is to continually improve from our experience and keep drawing better lines. Creating room for unintended offences and allowing the society to evolve.

Here the concept of the social contract becomes pivotal. We need to give up individual rights when they trample into the rights of others. We must not force a person to bear the brunt of someone’s actions, that he did not approve of at the first place.

Finally, I would like to point out that this stand transfers the burden of morality from the community to the individual which I say is both unrealistic and unfair. Unrealistic because we are expecting people to be rational and thoughtful before every action when we know people are emotional and guided by circumstances. Unfair because if a community can not stand to its morals, expecting individuals to do so…..

“If you have to offend someone to prove a logical/rational view; then either it is not a nice point, or you need to work on your communication.”

Popular posts from this blog

Election afterthoughts

The unfolding of the Indian election might have come as a surprise to many, for one is the BJP who steamrolled the campaign seasons with slogans of "400 par". While it remains 240 seats popular in a house of 520 members, a few stories should not go unnoticed. First, the BJP's popularity and the win for a third term is no ordinary feat. Only a few leaders of the past have managed such an elusive feat. This, indeed, is the trust that the brand Modi has built over the years. In politics, we often get acclimatized to the situations, in certain aspects too critical of it. When the young generation looked at Indira Gandhi's cabinet, they vowed never to again let such a solid mandate to a single party that its chief could declare an emergency, and no structures would be able to prevent that. This, however, ended up in fragmented colours in the Lok Sabha, the era of coalitions and surprise prime ministers. Needless to say, the horse-trading of MPs and the mindless corruption ...
dive in...

Consulting Constulting

Consultants are the most rampant, yet the most sushed topic in corporate. There are enough consulting firms today, to make one wonder if we need so many of them. And if the conundrum of needing to hire consultants was not big enough, here comes the issue of what they actually do. Over the last few years, many in the media have reported consulting firms to have held too much power for far too long to have become corrupted. Firms have relied on shady practices to keep their business afloat and, on many occasions, have walked out without much consequences. However, I find the above conclusion misrepresenting, if not incorrect.  The need for consultants doesn't arise from corporate's need to implement change or resolve issues. Corporations today are locked in an environment of constant change, be it in business models, products or even markets. The law forbids two companies from coming together and promising on a "happy ever-after". The consequence of this is action and r...
dive in...

Mathematics: A recondite language.

Before the Newtonian phase of philosophy, when natural philosophy was segregated from ordinary philosophical ventures for its commitment to repeated experimentation and scepticism, which would later be called the scientific way of knowing, there was an abstruse language. Unlike its well-known counterparts, this was extremely difficult to communicate and required well-defined logical reasoning to understand or expand. Essentially the worst kind of language, even millennia after its origin, it continues to haunt people by the name of mathematics.  Mathematics, as a language, starts with well-defined axioms. The most visible of them is in geometry, with the definitions of a point and a line. But such esoteric definitions continue all across mathematics. They do serve a great purpose, though, building one abstract concept over another because only when the idea of points well learn is it became easy to build that there can be another abstract concept of line, which passes through two p...
dive in...