Skip to main content

Offender's Compunction

 


“Death is a certainty for all of us, both you and me.” Does this offend you???
how about this “you b***** mo***, I CAN’T WAIT TO SEE YOU DEAD.” This does hurt.
So, Is right to offend an indispensable part of the freedom of expression and speech? I would gladly say NO.

Let’s start with the major stakeholders, the offender and the offended. It’s not natural for us to step out of our comfort zone and hurt someone else. Then why do we do so? The answer is psychological…
Its the repressed emotions of anger, jealousy and pride that seek expression inform of hate-speech, misinformation and condescending remarks. Thus every example of offence is a sign of spreading emotional malice in the society.

If you have ever been on the side of the offended,(given the rates of cyber-bullying, you are under threat), our body initiates a defence mechanism every time we are offended. That could be resistance or denial. Resistance is when we reciprocate offence with another offence and needless to say this is what begets violence. But the dangers of denial are no less. Every time we laugh off at a relatable meme or joke, we do realise the unhappiness and incompleteness. This way we keep destroying a part of our self-image. And this scenario is troublesome.

Also, we do live in a society, where minorities exist, and given the right to offend, the majority by the sheer power of their number marginalise them. And this has been the starting point of all homicides.

Coming to the subjectivity of offence, and our inability to draw a line between what is offending and what is not. We are at a crossroad with two options ahead. One to do away with drawing lines forever, unleashing a beast in the social structures. The other is to continually improve from our experience and keep drawing better lines. Creating room for unintended offences and allowing the society to evolve.

Here the concept of the social contract becomes pivotal. We need to give up individual rights when they trample into the rights of others. We must not force a person to bear the brunt of someone’s actions, that he did not approve of at the first place.

Finally, I would like to point out that this stand transfers the burden of morality from the community to the individual which I say is both unrealistic and unfair. Unrealistic because we are expecting people to be rational and thoughtful before every action when we know people are emotional and guided by circumstances. Unfair because if a community can not stand to its morals, expecting individuals to do so…..

“If you have to offend someone to prove a logical/rational view; then either it is not a nice point, or you need to work on your communication.”

Popular posts from this blog

Birth of a flood

The sky is almost dark, saving for those last golden tinges that would fade in no time. As palm trees mark the oblivion, a muddy reflection forms the ground. Last few days were mostly rainy. So profound is our love for rain. And why would not we? Unlike most other seasons, rain are so tender. A drop of patience which is about to reach its final destiny. Every time I look at rain drops they remind me of a struggle. A journey that begins with summer in an aura of dry and burning heat. And in no time the drop loses its sources. The long carried identity of its mother. With the loss of identity a awakening awaits. The pleasure to reach out and bond. As our drop moves up and up the end less skies, it realises the futility of pride and the necessity to bond. This comes with age. Not until it is near to earth it agrees to meet with other wanderers of the new world. And finally all our drops reach the cold atmosphere. The coldness makes life dreary and lonely. As the youthfulness dies out,...
dive in...

Election afterthoughts

The unfolding of the Indian election might have come as a surprise to many, for one is the BJP who steamrolled the campaign seasons with slogans of "400 par". While it remains 240 seats popular in a house of 520 members, a few stories should not go unnoticed. First, the BJP's popularity and the win for a third term is no ordinary feat. Only a few leaders of the past have managed such an elusive feat. This, indeed, is the trust that the brand Modi has built over the years. In politics, we often get acclimatized to the situations, in certain aspects too critical of it. When the young generation looked at Indira Gandhi's cabinet, they vowed never to again let such a solid mandate to a single party that its chief could declare an emergency, and no structures would be able to prevent that. This, however, ended up in fragmented colours in the Lok Sabha, the era of coalitions and surprise prime ministers. Needless to say, the horse-trading of MPs and the mindless corruption ...
dive in...

Turning back from pull to push

Two recent campaigns deserve attention from marketing enthusiasts, one of Campa Cola (reenergised by the Reliance Group) and of Tata Sampann's species. The challenges these two brands face are too distinct from one another. Campa, on the one hand, aims to fight the global brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereas Sampann looks to create a market in indian spices that has been dominated by local players like MDH and Everest. However, their strategies have something in common: getting the distributors to stock more of their products on the shelves. Campa is offering the distributors twice the margins, while Sampann is leveraging its vast portfolio to make stocking only Tata products a win for the distributors. Image credit: Economic Times To understand why this is happening, and what makes this interesting, one has to look back on the history of marketing, more specifically the shift from a push to a pull-based marketing, where the focus of the brands shifted from pushing their produc...
dive in...