Skip to main content

Working from Home

The service sector has embraced its long waiting armour, "work from home". As tech-powered solutions to avoid social gatherings continue to rise, I was concerned about the long-lasting ripples it might leave behind in the modern work culture. In fact, there could be other changes that this phenomena of working from home might trigger.

The push for using technology to create a virtual presence rather than a physical one was booming over the past few years thanks to better communication architecture. The coronavirus pandemic, only served to coerce it. But there is hardly any way of getting back from this. Infact, its better in two aspects one that if something could be done more comfortably from home there is apparently no point in forcing a culture. In fact, large corporates like google were actively working to make employees feel home at their offices. Now they have to feel official at their homes. Which can be done by simply having a soundproof conferencing room (or maybe corner) in the house. What has the employer to gain from this? The workhour suddenly expanded, the falsehood of segregated professional and personal life is now over. its deadlines that will now become terms of working not the office hours. To some extent that sounds like exploitation of the workers. Maybe a just exchange for a newfound comfort.

The second important advantage is less commute:- the single greatest burden on modern cities. This means lesser pollution, no rush hour traffic jam and lesser accidents. I understand that the changes might be unnoticeable since all corporates might not switch to work from home. The other greatest advantage is that working from home does open up a hoard of jobs, most in geographical locations that were earlier inaccessible. Germany could get its cheap tech-labour from Bangladesh (both of these countries are just an example). The very idea of urbanisation or bringing workers together is a product of industrialisation, and it makes no sense that the services sector still holds to this archaic policy. 

There are disadvantages and complications too. Without social contact co-workers would get alienated from one another, meeting mostly online like gamers. This could serve to fall of dedicated unions that enforced labour rights. Also these days, social living is mostly based on the jobs we do. Apartments filled with strangers who probably work in the city. Given that the social life of office has now dried up, you still need friends to share a beer with. This is where I believe we could look back at our neighbours, going back to the culture of the countryside or maybe into something new and interesting. Whatever may happen, the impetus that coronavirus gave to tech in the field of running offices will spin changes in the social fabric like none other. 

Popular posts from this blog

Changing face of Entertainment

The entertainment industry in India is waiting for yet another disruptive innovation, with millions of young users equipped with gigabytes of data every day, there is a new untapped customer base. Not particularly untapped since it makes do with pirated movies and free web series. But, there is an apparent lack of entertainment streamed towards them. Also, the shift from television sets to mobile devices, sets the stage clear for a change in content. the spikes in porn consumption and adult web series do speak of this unattended guest. The popularity of two platforms, mostly youtube and TikTok, have also helped in developing a new class of actors. To name a few Sumeet Vyas, Jitendra, Bhuvan Bam and much more. It has become apparent that the arduous task of going from one to another production house seeking a side role in a daily soap or movie, is on a decline. Not that, people won't get their debut at soaps and movies, but it seems easier to get a web series and keep working tha...

Politics of Perpetuity

There are obvious downsides to democracy. When we look at the distribution of opinion on a particular issue, it generally follows a normal distribution. This implies that to achieve the majority, it's theoretically advised to stick to the centre. And this love for mediocrity makes democracy allergic to politically solid decisions.  Along with it, democracies tend to be the rooster for sweet talkers. And that is an outcome rather than a voluntary trait. Primarily because most voters need to be equipped to deal with the complexities of the field. For example, it could be more practical for an electrical engineer to comprehend medical patterns and the pandemic's effect on production. Thus, democratic institutions need people managers who have two keywords to watch out for - sweet talking and status quo. However, democracies have been hugely popular. And people have reported being happier. Whether this is induced, indoctrinated or influenced is another question. But history has cho...

Potter beyond the ages.

The one series that must be crowned the best-seller of best-sellers is the "Harry Potter series". What Rowling brought to the world nearly two decades ago, should probably be crowned the pop culture of the 00's and everyone who grew in this era knows the impact this masterpiece has had in the lives of little boys to young girls. The three major characters which build up over the storyline are necessarily Harry (Potter), Severus(Snape) and Albus(Dumbledore). Harry, does symbolise the classic hero, born in difficult circumstances, blessed with a legacy that made him the special one. In fact, the whole book idolises Harry, his values find plenty of words and his exploits come up as the title of the book. It is without a doubt that Harry was the hero build for new teens who were on the maiden voyage to the literature and novel reading. And in this Rowling did prove her skills, with the language, approach and unfolding of the story.  Severus, however, is a hidden part...