Skip to main content

Working from Home

The service sector has embraced its long waiting armour, "work from home". As tech-powered solutions to avoid social gatherings continue to rise, I was concerned about the long-lasting ripples it might leave behind in the modern work culture. In fact, there could be other changes that this phenomena of working from home might trigger.

The push for using technology to create a virtual presence rather than a physical one was booming over the past few years thanks to better communication architecture. The coronavirus pandemic, only served to coerce it. But there is hardly any way of getting back from this. Infact, its better in two aspects one that if something could be done more comfortably from home there is apparently no point in forcing a culture. In fact, large corporates like google were actively working to make employees feel home at their offices. Now they have to feel official at their homes. Which can be done by simply having a soundproof conferencing room (or maybe corner) in the house. What has the employer to gain from this? The workhour suddenly expanded, the falsehood of segregated professional and personal life is now over. its deadlines that will now become terms of working not the office hours. To some extent that sounds like exploitation of the workers. Maybe a just exchange for a newfound comfort.

The second important advantage is less commute:- the single greatest burden on modern cities. This means lesser pollution, no rush hour traffic jam and lesser accidents. I understand that the changes might be unnoticeable since all corporates might not switch to work from home. The other greatest advantage is that working from home does open up a hoard of jobs, most in geographical locations that were earlier inaccessible. Germany could get its cheap tech-labour from Bangladesh (both of these countries are just an example). The very idea of urbanisation or bringing workers together is a product of industrialisation, and it makes no sense that the services sector still holds to this archaic policy. 

There are disadvantages and complications too. Without social contact co-workers would get alienated from one another, meeting mostly online like gamers. This could serve to fall of dedicated unions that enforced labour rights. Also these days, social living is mostly based on the jobs we do. Apartments filled with strangers who probably work in the city. Given that the social life of office has now dried up, you still need friends to share a beer with. This is where I believe we could look back at our neighbours, going back to the culture of the countryside or maybe into something new and interesting. Whatever may happen, the impetus that coronavirus gave to tech in the field of running offices will spin changes in the social fabric like none other. 

Popular posts from this blog

Politics of Perpetuity

There are obvious downsides to democracy. When we look at the distribution of opinion on a particular issue, it generally follows a normal distribution. This implies that to achieve the majority, it's theoretically advised to stick to the centre. And this love for mediocrity makes democracy allergic to politically solid decisions.  Along with it, democracies tend to be the rooster for sweet talkers. And that is an outcome rather than a voluntary trait. Primarily because most voters need to be equipped to deal with the complexities of the field. For example, it could be more practical for an electrical engineer to comprehend medical patterns and the pandemic's effect on production. Thus, democratic institutions need people managers who have two keywords to watch out for - sweet talking and status quo. However, democracies have been hugely popular. And people have reported being happier. Whether this is induced, indoctrinated or influenced is another question. But history has cho...

Turning back from pull to push

Two recent campaigns deserve attention from marketing enthusiasts, one of Campa Cola (reenergised by the Reliance Group) and of Tata Sampann's species. The challenges these two brands face are too distinct from one another. Campa, on the one hand, aims to fight the global brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereas Sampann looks to create a market in indian spices that has been dominated by local players like MDH and Everest. However, their strategies have something in common: getting the distributors to stock more of their products on the shelves. Campa is offering the distributors twice the margins, while Sampann is leveraging its vast portfolio to make stocking only Tata products a win for the distributors. Image credit: Economic Times To understand why this is happening, and what makes this interesting, one has to look back on the history of marketing, more specifically the shift from a push to a pull-based marketing, where the focus of the brands shifted from pushing their produc...

The Theatre Era

As tough times await us, it's frivolous to talk about theatres. But doesn't it look like theatres would go out of fashion before the pandemic ends( But would it ?? ) With the footfall on OTT platforms rising daily. Looking at a screen stuck to the chair, with no ability to pause or even play subtitles, sounds so technologically inferior. The blockbuster release has increasingly been  generously funded , mega-multi-starrer films, which keep running sequels until they go unprofitable . In fact, content is sometimes the second priority; the fan base and the festive season come first. Over the years, movie houses have mastered this art. Roping in top actors into characters that have gone synonymous with their name. The OTT platforms, however, are earmarked for the content. Their promise to give a shot to the aspiring director who doesn't have funds to compete against the mult-million movie releases. Thus i n its cast and crew shines the raw, untamed art which any critic would b...