Skip to main content

Working from Home

The service sector has embraced its long waiting armour, "work from home". As tech-powered solutions to avoid social gatherings continue to rise, I was concerned about the long-lasting ripples it might leave behind in the modern work culture. In fact, there could be other changes that this phenomena of working from home might trigger.

The push for using technology to create a virtual presence rather than a physical one was booming over the past few years thanks to better communication architecture. The coronavirus pandemic, only served to coerce it. But there is hardly any way of getting back from this. Infact, its better in two aspects one that if something could be done more comfortably from home there is apparently no point in forcing a culture. In fact, large corporates like google were actively working to make employees feel home at their offices. Now they have to feel official at their homes. Which can be done by simply having a soundproof conferencing room (or maybe corner) in the house. What has the employer to gain from this? The workhour suddenly expanded, the falsehood of segregated professional and personal life is now over. its deadlines that will now become terms of working not the office hours. To some extent that sounds like exploitation of the workers. Maybe a just exchange for a newfound comfort.

The second important advantage is less commute:- the single greatest burden on modern cities. This means lesser pollution, no rush hour traffic jam and lesser accidents. I understand that the changes might be unnoticeable since all corporates might not switch to work from home. The other greatest advantage is that working from home does open up a hoard of jobs, most in geographical locations that were earlier inaccessible. Germany could get its cheap tech-labour from Bangladesh (both of these countries are just an example). The very idea of urbanisation or bringing workers together is a product of industrialisation, and it makes no sense that the services sector still holds to this archaic policy. 

There are disadvantages and complications too. Without social contact co-workers would get alienated from one another, meeting mostly online like gamers. This could serve to fall of dedicated unions that enforced labour rights. Also these days, social living is mostly based on the jobs we do. Apartments filled with strangers who probably work in the city. Given that the social life of office has now dried up, you still need friends to share a beer with. This is where I believe we could look back at our neighbours, going back to the culture of the countryside or maybe into something new and interesting. Whatever may happen, the impetus that coronavirus gave to tech in the field of running offices will spin changes in the social fabric like none other. 

Popular posts from this blog

Behind the Gig economy.

The battle between push and pull is familiar to supply chains. For ages now, industries have produced goods they thought were relevant for the customer and then used networks of distributors and retailers to push these to the consumers. The apparent outcome of this is the massive scale of advertising that uses tactics to lure a customer base for the product.  The shift to a pull-based supply chain seems more rational. One is where the production takes in the customer's demand before the show. Not only does that minimize the risk of product failure, but it also captures the market sentiment with greater accuracy. In other words, it caters to an existing demand rather than creating one for itself. This process is lean and profitable, except for a shortcoming; Production takes time. During the early 90s, when the internet spread like wildfire, people almost immediately expected the internet business to take off. However, it was only after a decade and a massive dot com bubble that tod...

Gift of India

India finds its etymological origins in the Indus, the first of the largest rivers that marks the plains if one travels through the land routes from the West. However, in the present fate of the State, the river lies in Pakistan, best described as a geopolitical adversary. The other words for the state, like Hindustan or the abode of Hindus, have slightly relevant terminology but none that reflects the actual history. Since no Hindu king had presided over the land after the 11 century. Further, it's crucial to note that no king has ever ruled over the entirety of present India at any point in history. Instead, rulers have found it easier to consolidate the connected regions of Pak and Afghan than the southern coasts. Midst all these historical facets, the question that begs to be asked is when India began to identify itself. Many believe the form that India exists today must be credited to the Britishers. I find this argument, first of all, hollow and, secondly, misleading. Open be...

Changing face of Entertainment

The entertainment industry in India is waiting for yet another disruptive innovation, with millions of young users equipped with gigabytes of data every day, there is a new untapped customer base. Not particularly untapped since it makes do with pirated movies and free web series. But, there is an apparent lack of entertainment streamed towards them. Also, the shift from television sets to mobile devices, sets the stage clear for a change in content. the spikes in porn consumption and adult web series do speak of this unattended guest. The popularity of two platforms, mostly youtube and TikTok, have also helped in developing a new class of actors. To name a few Sumeet Vyas, Jitendra, Bhuvan Bam and much more. It has become apparent that the arduous task of going from one to another production house seeking a side role in a daily soap or movie, is on a decline. Not that, people won't get their debut at soaps and movies, but it seems easier to get a web series and keep working tha...