A beautiful facet of Indian mythology is its very nature of the presentation. Most of the stories are merely answers to intriguing questions, drawing attention to the basis of societal design and functioning. The narration merely presents a scenario to questionee. Quite different from other forms which build upon a higher than a human figure of the hero and dehumanise the villain. So, when mythology is retold, it must be open to new perceptions and interpretations. This by no means should be judgmental, rather a more encompassing exercise.
But, the picture of modern society speaks a sorry tale. A place where, a constant and deliberate attempt is made to match between the protagonist of myths, to ensure just a mental pleasure or some other gains. This, however, comes at a cost, the cost of reason since most choose to accept the majoritarian opinion as for the truth. The shift, from dialogue to an authocratic discourses is at the heart of the atavism, I intend to speak of.
Looking back at one's ancient culture and seeking pride from it is no stranger to any nation, but being protective about the image of the characters and the presented structure of life is a newer phenomenon. To an extent where facts and phrases in science textbooks are quoted from works of mythology, may deter the real purpose of scientific education, the ability to reason with. Though, there have been some interesting descriptions in our literature, that have as of yet, no scientific explanation. Claiming them to be beyond science is as false as stating them untrue.
Therefore as an endnote, I must add, that doubt is a powerful evolutionary instinct. The human nature to be specific has single-handedly let us discover hidden truths and still keep looking for what more could be hidden within. In this regard claiming something as absolute truth and condemning the questioning of its claim, seems no more than an idiosyncratic atavism.