Skip to main content

Not So Social: The Dark Side of Social Media and Millennial Mindset


Why does social media feel like a double-edged sword for so many of us? We all face challenges with social media, yet its pull remains irresistible.

The root cause lies in a major ideological shift that emerged alongside the technological revolution around the millennium. Millennials — those who grew up in the 2000s — witnessed innovation shaking traditional norms. They admired thinkers, leaders, and anyone who dared to challenge the status quo.
A defining belief for this generation was that “everyone is special.” This fueled a desire for recognition and a platform to showcase unique talents. Millennials became known for breaking rules and injecting fresh energy and creativity, though often at the cost of personal burnout.

Conversely, discipline and conventional thinking hold subtle advantages. Sure, the chance of becoming super famous is slim, but the risk of failure is also low, akin to a safe investment. However, millennials tend to reject this conservative path.
These societal shifts naturally called for a stage to exhibit talents — a marketplace of showmanship. Social media perfectly fits that role. But here lies the problem. Talent drives the social media ecosystem, where everyone is a seller and few are buyers. Without regulation or agreed-upon standards, everyone believes their content deserves attention. This breeds trolling, hate speech, meaningless pranks, and more.

Social media is increasingly becoming a dangerous place, flooded with what many would label “garbage.” Yet, can we truly blame these creators? They genuinely believe their content is talent, and convincing them otherwise is almost impossible. Understanding this dynamic is crucial. Social media reflects not just how we connect, but the deep-seated ideological shifts in how we value recognition, talent, and success today. Are we ready to rethink how we engage with this digital marketplace—and perhaps demand more from it?

Popular posts from this blog

Changing face of Entertainment

The entertainment industry in India is waiting for yet another disruptive innovation, with millions of young users equipped with gigabytes of data every day, there is a new untapped customer base. Not particularly untapped since it makes do with pirated movies and free web series. But, there is an apparent lack of entertainment streamed towards them. Also, the shift from television sets to mobile devices, sets the stage clear for a change in content. the spikes in porn consumption and adult web series do speak of this unattended guest. The popularity of two platforms, mostly youtube and TikTok, have also helped in developing a new class of actors. To name a few Sumeet Vyas, Jitendra, Bhuvan Bam and much more. It has become apparent that the arduous task of going from one to another production house seeking a side role in a daily soap or movie, is on a decline. Not that, people won't get their debut at soaps and movies, but it seems easier to get a web series and keep working tha...
dive in...

Senegol: A staff of moral jurisprudence.

India's latest parliament building was done within 2 years, which is remarkable in a country where large projects are known to be marred with corruption and bureaucratic blockades, ultimately shooting the estimates. The parliament like most of the other Delhi architectures, was a reminiscence of the colonial era, which the rulers of the day found symbolic in taking over. It has to do with the fact that Indian independence was mostly seen as a peaceful transfer of power rather than a violent outing of the colonizers, as with many other Asian countries. The claim for peace in the process was somewhat lost in the massive riots that followed the partition of the erstwhile British India Colony. But the establishments of the British era were carried on, and sometimes even the legislation still needed to be changed. This, if one would agree, does manifest the Indian idolisation of the Western culture, or at least the veneration of the West among its ruling elite. It was, therefore, impera...
dive in...

Behind the Gig economy.

The battle between push and pull is familiar to supply chains. For ages now, industries have produced goods they thought were relevant for the customer and then used networks of distributors and retailers to push these to the consumers. The apparent outcome of this is the massive scale of advertising that uses tactics to lure a customer base for the product.  The shift to a pull-based supply chain seems more rational. One is where the production takes in the customer's demand before the show. Not only does that minimize the risk of product failure, but it also captures the market sentiment with greater accuracy. In other words, it caters to an existing demand rather than creating one for itself. This process is lean and profitable, except for a shortcoming; Production takes time. During the early 90s, when the internet spread like wildfire, people almost immediately expected the internet business to take off. However, it was only after a decade and a massive dot com bubble that tod...
dive in...